NCMHCE Practice Questions (2026) — Free Sample Questions with Answers

14 free NCMHCE questions from our 150-question bank, grouped by content domain. Each answer explains why the right option is right — and why every wrong option is wrong.

0 of 14 answered — answer a question to check it Take a full NCMHCE practice test

Intake, Assessment, and Diagnosis

Question 1

Which diagnosis is best supported by the information gathered at Mesfin's intake?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: D

adjustment disorder with anxiety: Near-sibling: the worry began within 3 months of the move, but adjustment disorder is not given when full criteria for another disorder are met.

acculturation difficulty: Incomplete: acculturation difficulty is an "other condition that may be a focus of clinical attention," not a disorder that accounts for his full symptom picture.

illness anxiety disorder: Too narrow: health is only one of many worry topics, and his physical complaints led to medical visits rather than a fixed fear of disease.

generalized anxiety disorder: Correct. He describes hard-to-control worry about many topics, including things going well, more days than not for about a year, with muscle tension, fatigue, poor concentration, irritability and sleep disturbance.

GAD requires excessive, hard-to-control worry about multiple areas for at least 6 months plus 3 of 6 symptoms; a recent stressor does not change the diagnosis to adjustment disorder when GAD criteria are met.

Question 2

Which finding sets the severity specifier in Simone's provisional diagnosis?

Case study: Young adult with binge eating and purging

Client
Age23
GenderFemale
SexualityBisexual
EthnicityWhite (Italian American)
Relationship StatusIn a relationship, living with partner
Counseling SettingPrivate practice
Types of CounselingIndividual
Provisional DiagnosisBulimia nervosa, Moderate

Presenting Problem

You are a licensed mental health counselor working in a private practice. Simone, a 23-year-old staffing coordinator, schedules an intake after her boyfriend, Julian, walked in on her vomiting in their bathroom and told her he would not "pretend this isn't happening anymore." Simone says, "I've been hiding this for almost a year. I'm here because he made me promise, but I also know I can't keep doing it."

Simone reports that about 10 months ago, after she was passed over for a promotion, she started a strict diet: she skips breakfast and lunch and tries to eat only a small dinner. On about three evenings a week she eats far more than most people would in a similar time, such as a family-size box of cereal, a sleeve of cookies and leftover takeout within about an hour. "Once I start, I can't stop until I feel sick." After each binge she makes herself vomit, and she also vomits after some ordinary meals that include foods she considers "off limits." She estimates that she vomits about five times a week on average and has done so for at least the past six months. She denies laxative, diuretic or diet-pill use and says she exercises "normally."

Simone says her weight "has barely moved," and her primary care provider described her weight as in the healthy range at a physical about a year ago. Even so, "If I gain two pounds, the whole day is ruined. How I look decides whether I'm a good person or not." After a binge she tells herself, "I'm disgusting." Twice in the past month she has felt light-headed when standing up quickly, and once she noticed her heart "fluttering" at work; she has not told anyone. She spends about $60 a week on binge food, has been late to work several times after nights of bingeing, and now declines dinner invitations from friends because she "can't control what will be served."

When asked about safety, Simone denies suicidal ideation, intent or plan and denies any history of self-harm: "Sometimes I wish I could disappear for a week so nobody sees me like this, but I would never hurt myself." She denies homicidal ideation.

Mental Status Exam

Simone arrived on time, well groomed and casually dressed. She was oriented to person, place, time and situation. Her affect was anxious and constricted, congruent with her stated mood of "ashamed and worn out." Recent and remote memory were intact. Motor activity and gait were normal. You observed mild swelling along both sides of her jaw and small calluses on the knuckles of her right hand. Eye contact was good except when she described eating episodes, when she looked at the floor. Thought process was linear and goal directed; thought content was preoccupied with weight, shape and food rules. She denied perceptual disturbances, suicidal or homicidal ideation, and any history of mania or hypomania. She drinks two or three glasses of wine on weekends and denies drug use.

Psychosocial and Family History

Simone grew up with her mother and older brother after her parents divorced when she was 9. She describes her mother as loving but "always on a diet" and recalls her mother commenting on her body when she was a teenager. Simone competed in gymnastics through high school. She has lived with Julian for a year and describes the relationship as supportive but strained since he discovered the vomiting. She earned a business degree and has worked as a staffing coordinator for two years; her finances are stable, and she uses her employer's insurance for counseling. She was raised Catholic and does not currently practice. A trauma screen was negative. At the end of the intake she says, "Please don't call my doctor. She'll want to weigh me and run tests, and I'll freak out. Can this just stay between us?"

Show answer & explanation

Answer: B

the frequency of her binge-eating episodes, about three per week: Wrong behavior: binge frequency sets severity in binge-eating disorder; in bulimia nervosa severity follows compensatory behaviors (three a week would also read as mild).

the frequency of her self-induced vomiting, about five times a week: Correct: bulimia nervosa severity is based on the average weekly frequency of inappropriate compensatory behaviors; about five vomiting episodes falls in the moderate band (4–7).

the combined total of her binges and vomiting, about eight per week: Calculation error: binges and purges are not added together, and a combined count of eight would wrongly suggest severe (8–13).

her weight in the healthy range, measured by her body mass index: Wrong disorder rule: body mass index sets severity in anorexia nervosa, not bulimia nervosa.

DSM-5-TR bulimia nervosa severity counts compensatory episodes per week: mild 1–3, moderate 4–7, severe 8–13, extreme 14 or more.

Question 3

Which diagnosis do the intake findings best support, considering the client's account of last April?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: D

major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate: Ruled out by the history: a lifetime hypomanic episode excludes major depressive disorder.

bipolar I disorder, current or most recent episode depressed: Near-sibling: mania requires at least 7 days (or hospitalization) with marked impairment; her episode lasted 6 days and she kept up classes and work.

cyclothymic disorder: Excluded: cyclothymic disorder requires 2 years of subthreshold symptoms and no full major depressive episode, and she has had full episodes.

bipolar II disorder, current or most recent episode depressed: Correct: one hypomanic episode (6 days, observed by others, no marked impairment or psychosis, not substance-related) plus a current major depressive episode meets bipolar II.

Bipolar II requires at least one hypomanic and one major depressive episode and no lifetime manic episode; duration and impairment separate hypomania from mania.

Question 4

Which criteria determine the severity specifier for the client's alcohol use disorder?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: A

Five criteria: drinking more than intended, failed attempts to cut down, craving, driving after drinking, and tolerance, so moderate: Correct: larger amounts ("the twelve-pack is gone"), unsuccessful efforts to cut down, midafternoon craving, recurrent use in hazardous situations (driving) and tolerance give five criteria; 4–5 criteria is moderate.

Six criteria: the five consumption and hazard criteria plus legal problems from the two DUI arrests, so severe: Outdated criterion: recurrent legal problems were dropped in DSM-5, so the fines and probation do not count; the driving itself already counts as hazardous use.

Six criteria: the five consumption and hazard criteria plus drinking to ease the loneliness of a quiet house, so severe: Non-criterion fact: drinking to cope is a motive, not a DSM-5-TR criterion.

Seven criteria: the five consumption and hazard criteria plus both the DUI-related legal problems and drinking to cope, so severe: Double over-count: neither legal problems nor coping motives are criteria; he also denies withdrawal, role failure and giving up activities (he still bowls).

DSM-5-TR alcohol use disorder severity: 2–3 criteria mild, 4–5 moderate, 6 or more severe; legal problems are no longer a criterion.

Question 5

Considering Walter's symptoms and their duration since Gene's death, what diagnosis best fits his presentation?

Case study: Older adult after a spouse's death

Client
Age74
GenderMale
SexualityGay
EthnicityWhite
Relationship StatusWidowed
Counseling SettingIntegrated primary care clinic (behavioral health in a family medicine practice)
Types of CounselingIndividual
Provisional DiagnosisDeferred pending assessment

Presenting Problem

You are a licensed mental health counselor working in an integrated primary care clinic, where you see patients referred by the clinic's physicians. Walter, a 74-year-old retired high school chemistry teacher, is referred by his primary care physician after his annual visit, at which he had lost 15 pounds in a year and told the nurse, "I'm just marking time until I can be with Gene." Walter's husband of 31 years, Gene, died 14 months ago of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) after Walter cared for him at home for nearly 3 years. Walter says, "Every day I wake up, and for a second I think he's downstairs making coffee, and then it hits me again." He describes a near-constant longing for Gene and says most of his day is spent thinking about him; he still sets out two mugs and talks to Gene's photo each evening. He says, "I know he's gone, but I don't believe it, if that makes sense." He avoids the diner where they ate every Sunday and drives miles out of his way to avoid the hospice office. He stopped singing in his community choir after Gene died: "Without him in the second row, what's the point?" He describes feeling "numb at the edges" and says life "stopped meaning anything when he did." He feels intensely lonely "every single evening." He eats poorly because "Gene was the cook," and the weight loss has been gradual. He sleeps about six hours, waking once, and says his energy is "fine for an old man." He enjoys weekly visits from his grandnephew and still reads the newspaper every morning. He describes himself as "a decent person who just lost his other half" and denies feeling worthless, though he feels some guilt for "not noticing his stumbling sooner." His PHQ-9 total today is 9. When asked about suicide, Walter says, "I don't want to die, exactly. Some nights I just don't care if I wake up." He denies a plan, intent, preparatory behavior or past attempts. He denies homicidal ideation.

Mental Status Exam

Walter arrives early, neatly dressed in a pressed shirt that now hangs loosely on him; grooming is good. He is alert and oriented to person, place, time and situation. Eye contact is good, although he looks down at his wedding ring when speaking of Gene. His mood is "empty"; affect is tearful when he discusses Gene and brightens when he describes his grandnephew, congruent with content. Speech is soft and normal in rate. Thought process is logical and goal-directed; thought content focuses on Gene and the years of caregiving. He denies hallucinations and says he talks to Gene's photo but has never heard a reply. Recent and remote memory are intact. Gait is slow but steady. He reports passive death wishes as described, denies plan, intent and homicidal ideation, and denies any history of mania. He has one glass of wine with dinner "some nights" and denies other substance use.

Psychosocial and Family History

Walter and Gene met in their early 40s and married as soon as they legally could. They had no children; Walter's niece and her 10-year-old son visit weekly, and his niece drove him to today's appointment. Gene's siblings, who "never accepted us," planned the funeral in Gene's hometown church and listed Walter only as "a close friend" in the obituary. Walter says, "They erased thirty-one years in one paragraph." He lives on a teacher's pension and owns his home. He describes himself as "spiritual, not religious." Friends from the choir call now and then, but he lets the calls go to voicemail. He has never been in counseling. His trauma screen is negative. He signed the clinic's integrated-care consent form at check-in but says he "just signed where they pointed." At the end of the intake, Walter asks, "Does Dr. Okafor see everything I tell you? I don't want my doctor thinking I'm losing my marbles."

Show answer & explanation

Answer: A

prolonged grief disorder: Correct. More than 12 months after Gene's death, Walter has daily yearning and preoccupation plus at least three Criterion C symptoms (disbelief, avoiding reminders, difficulty re-engaging with choir, numbness, meaninglessness, intense loneliness), which is DSM-5-TR prolonged grief disorder.

major depressive disorder, single episode, mild: Near-sibling: his distress centers on Gene, he still enjoys his grandnephew and the newspaper, his self-worth is intact and his PHQ-9 is 9; he does not show five MDD symptoms including pervasive depressed mood or loss of interest.

adjustment disorder with depressed mood: Excluded: adjustment disorder is not diagnosed when the disturbance is normal bereavement or is better explained by prolonged grief disorder, which his grief-specific symptoms meet.

persistent depressive disorder: Duration and pattern mismatch: persistent depressive disorder needs 2 years of depressed mood most days; his symptoms are 14 months of grief-specific longing.

Prolonged grief disorder in adults needs at least 12 months since the death, yearning or preoccupation, and three of eight Criterion C symptoms; depressive disorders center on pervasive low mood and self-worth, not on the person who died.

Question 6

Which client report supports adding the "with dissociative symptoms" specifier to Lamont's PTSD diagnosis?

Case study: Veteran with nightmares and nightly drinking

Client
Age38
GenderMale
SexualityHeterosexual
EthnicityAfrican American
Relationship StatusMarried
Counseling SettingCommunity counseling agency serving veterans and families
Types of CounselingIndividual
Provisional DiagnosisPosttraumatic stress disorder (specifiers to be determined)

Presenting Problem

You are a licensed mental health counselor working in a community counseling agency that serves veterans and their families. Lamont, a 38-year-old Army veteran who served two deployments as a combat medic, comes to intake at his wife's urging after she found him asleep in his truck in the driveway at 3 a.m. following a night of drinking. He says, "She thinks I'm falling apart. I think I'm just tired." Lamont left the military 3 years ago. He describes a convoy attack 11 years ago in which a soldier he was treating died. He says he "held it together" for years, but over the past 14 months, since a coworker was killed in a line-work accident, his symptoms have steadily worsened. He has nightmares about the convoy four to five nights a week, wakes "soaked and swinging," and now sleeps in a recliner so he will not hit his wife. When a truck backfires, "for a few seconds I'm back on that road, and I can smell it." He avoids war movies and unit reunions, has stopped watching the news and drives long routes to avoid overpasses. He says, "I love my daughter, but the feeling's switched off. I can't get it back." He startles at slamming doors, sits facing exits and checks the door locks two or three times a night. He blames himself: "A real medic would have stopped the bleeding." Several times a month, for a few minutes at a time and including on days he has not been drinking, "everything around me looks flat and fake, like a movie set." Lamont drinks five or six beers most nights "to get to sleep" and more on weekends; his AUDIT score today is 18. He has missed four shifts in the past 2 months and received a written warning. When asked directly about suicide, he says, "Some nights I think it would be easier to just not be here anymore, but I wouldn't do that to them." He denies a plan, intent or past attempts. He keeps a loaded handgun in his nightstand "for security." He denies thoughts of harming others.

Mental Status Exam

Lamont arrives on time, casually dressed and adequately groomed, with a healing cut on his knuckles that he says came from "punching the headboard in a dream." He is oriented to person, place, time and situation. He sits with his back to the wall and scans the room when the hallway door closes. Eye contact is intermittent. His mood is "worn out"; affect is constricted and congruent with mood. Speech is normal in rate and low in volume. Thought process is linear and goal-directed, and thought content centers on guilt about the convoy and worry about his job. He denies hallucinations and describes the "movie set" episodes with reality testing intact. Memory is grossly intact, though he reports poor concentration at work. Gait is normal, and his startle response is elevated. He reports passive death wishes as described, denies intent, plan and homicidal ideation, and denies any history of mania. Alcohol use is as described; he denies other drug use.

Psychosocial and Family History

Lamont has been married for 9 years and has a 7-year-old daughter. He works as a field technician for a regional electric utility; the company's employee assistance program (EAP) gave him the agency's name after his written warning. His father, also a veteran, "drank his feelings," and Lamont says he swore he would never be like him. He was raised in the Church of God in Christ and says his faith "went quiet" after his second deployment. He texts with a few soldiers from his unit but has not seen any of them in over a year. Money is tight since the warning put his overtime on hold. He has had no prior counseling and declined mental health services when he left the Army because "it goes in your record." His trauma screen is positive, and his PCL-5 total at intake is 54. At the end of the intake, Lamont asks, "If I tell you how much I really drink, does my job or the VA find out?"

Show answer & explanation

Answer: D

his feelings for his daughter being "switched off": Near-sibling: this is persistent inability to feel positive emotions (Criterion D7), a core PTSD symptom, not depersonalization or derealization.

his convoy nightmares that leave him swinging in his sleep: Criterion B2 (distressing dreams): an intrusion symptom that supports the diagnosis, not the dissociative specifier.

his flashbacks of being back on that road whenever a truck backfires: Near-sibling: flashbacks are dissociative reactions under Criterion B3 and are already part of the core diagnosis; the specifier needs persistent depersonalization or derealization.

his episodes in which his surroundings look "flat and fake": Correct. Recurrent experiences of his surroundings as unreal ("like a movie set"), with reality testing intact and occurring on days he has not been drinking, are derealization, which the "with dissociative symptoms" specifier requires on top of full PTSD criteria.

The DSM-5-TR dissociative specifier needs persistent or recurrent depersonalization or derealization not caused by a substance; flashbacks (B3) and emotional numbing (D7) are core PTSD symptoms and do not qualify.

Question 7

How would you proceed after Nadia's individual screening disclosure about the wall punch and the blocked doorway?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: A

Assess further with Nadia privately for fear, control, and escalation.: Correct: intimidation and blocking an exit are IPV warning signs, so a private, fuller assessment of fear, coercive control, injuries, and escalation decides whether conjoint work is safe and what safety planning is needed.

Raise the incident at the next joint session so both can address it.: Unsafe: disclosing her report in front of Graham without her consent could put her at risk, and she asked you not to raise it yet.

Begin conjoint sessions as planned and monitor for any new incidents.: Acceptable later, not now: conjoint work may be appropriate if assessment shows low-level situational conflict, but starting before assessment ignores a warning sign.

End couple counseling and refer each partner for individual counseling.: Premature: one incident with no fear or prior violence does not by itself rule out couple work; the decision should follow a fuller assessment.

An IPV disclosure in individual screening calls for a private, thorough risk assessment before deciding whether conjoint counseling is safe; never surface it in joint session without the disclosing partner's consent.

Question 8

What would you do first after Mina reveals the fresh scratches and describes using an opened paperclip?

Case study: Adolescent with anxiety after bullying

Client
Age15
GenderFemale
SexualityHeterosexual
EthnicityKorean American
Relationship StatusSingle
Counseling SettingPrivate practice
Types of CounselingIndividual
Provisional DiagnosisDeferred pending assessment

Presenting Problem

You are a licensed mental health counselor working in a private practice. Mina, a 15-year-old tenth grader, is brought to counseling by her mother after the school counselor noticed that Mina eats lunch alone in a library study room most days. Her mother signed consent for treatment, and Mina agreed to attend "for now." Early in the interview Mina said, "My mom made me come. Talking about it doesn't fix anything."

Eight months ago, while Mina gave an oral report in history class, her voice shook and she lost her place. Two classmates recorded her, and the clip circulated in a class group chat with mocking comments; one of them still calls her "Shaky" in the hallway. Since then Mina has avoided speaking in class, refused two oral presentations (her history grade fell from a B to a D), quit the school orchestra after nine years of violin, and asks her mother to order for her at restaurants. When a teacher calls on her, she blushes and trembles, and her mind "goes blank." She says, "Everyone is just waiting for me to mess up again so they can laugh." She worries for days before any class where she might have to speak and has missed six school days this semester, usually with stomachaches on presentation days. She is comfortable talking with her one close friend, Ji-woo, at home, and says she was "pretty normal" before the video.

Her mother reports that Mina spends most evenings in her room scrolling the group chat and sleeps poorly on school nights. Mina says she sometimes wishes she could "just disappear for a while," but she denies suicidal ideation, intent, or plan and denies any self-harm. She denies homicidal ideation. Mina adds, "My mom thinks I'm being dramatic. She says she got teased too and got over it."

Mental Status Exam

Mina wore an oversized hoodie with the hood partly up; grooming and hygiene were adequate. She was oriented to person, place, time, and situation. She described her mood as "fine," while her affect was anxious and constricted, incongruent with her stated mood. Memory was intact, and motor activity and gait were normal; she sat with her arms wrapped around her knees and blushed when school was discussed. Eye contact was minimal, and she often looked at her phone. Her answers were brief, but her thought process was logical and goal directed. Thought content focused on fears of being judged and humiliated. She denied perceptual disturbances, suicidal or homicidal ideation, and any history of elevated or expansive mood. She denied alcohol, vaping, or other substance use.

Psychosocial and Family History

Mina lives with her mother, a nurse who works night shifts, and her 11-year-old brother. Her parents divorced when she was 7; her father lives out of state, and she talks with him by video monthly. Her mother emigrated from Korea as a young adult. The family speaks Korean and English at home and attends a Korean Presbyterian church, where Mina used to play violin during services. Before this year Mina earned mostly A's and B's. Her trauma screen identified the bullying and the video but no physical or sexual abuse. Her mother signed a release allowing you to exchange attendance information and school-based recommendations with the school counselor. As the intake ends, her mother steps out to move the car, and Mina asks quietly, "Are you going to tell my mom everything I say in here?"

Show answer & explanation

Answer: B

Call her mother into the session to inform her of this right away.: Right action, wrong order: her mother will likely need to be involved per safety and policy, but assessing the behavior comes first so that what is shared is accurate.

Assess frequency, method, intent, and any suicidal thoughts.: Correct: before any other step, a risk assessment of the self-injury (onset, frequency, method, wound care, function, and suicidal ideation) determines urgency and next steps.

Teach her a substitute coping skill, such as holding ice cubes.: Premature: replacement skills belong in a safety plan built after the risk has been assessed.

Refer her to an intensive outpatient program for self-harm.: Level of care chosen before assessment: nothing yet indicates she needs more than outpatient care, and the referral skips the risk assessment.

When self-injury is disclosed, assess it fully, including suicidal ideation and intent, before choosing parent notification, a safety plan, or a level of care.

Question 9

What comorbid disorder warrants further assessment, considering Terrence's avoidance of highways, buses, crowded stores, and school assemblies?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: B

specific phobia, situational type: Near-sibling: a situational specific phobia centers on one situation feared for itself, but Terrence fears several situation types because escape or help would be unavailable.

agoraphobia: Correct: he fears and avoids two or more agoraphobic situations (public transportation, enclosed spaces such as stores, crowds) because "I can't get out, and nobody there would know what to do," and DSM-5-TR diagnoses agoraphobia separately from panic disorder.

illness anxiety disorder: Excluded by the picture: his health fears follow intense physical attack symptoms and are better explained by panic disorder, not a preoccupation with minimal symptoms.

social anxiety disorder: Near-sibling: social anxiety avoidance is driven by fear of scrutiny or embarrassment, whereas Terrence's stated fear is being trapped without help during an attack.

Since DSM-5, agoraphobia is a separate diagnosis: assess it whenever fear of being trapped or without help spans at least two of the five situation types for six months or more.

Counseling Skills and Interventions

Question 10

From an MI perspective, what response would you make after Dennis says one good run would fix the hole, but that is how he got here?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: C

"That idea of one good run is exactly what keeps the debt growing.": Righting reflex: arguing against his sustain talk invites him to defend it.

"What would you do with the money if you did hit a good run?": Reinforces sustain talk: the question explores the hope of winning rather than the reasons to change.

"You're hoping for a fix, and you also see where that hope led.": Correct. A double-sided reflection holds both sides of his ambivalence and ends on the change side, which invites more change talk.

"It sounds like you're ready to give up gambling for good.": Overshooting: the reflection goes beyond what he said, and he may pull back toward the other side of the ambivalence.

In MI, a double-sided reflection captures both sides of ambivalence, usually ending on the change side, without arguing for change.

Question 11

From a child-centered play therapy perspective, what response would you make as Theo brings the ship into the harbor?

Case study: Child with separation fears during a parent's deployment

Client
Client
Age8
GenderMale
SexualityNot assessed (child)
EthnicityMultiracial (Black and White)
Relationship StatusChild; lives with his father while his mother is deployed
Counseling SettingCommunity counseling agency
Types of CounselingTo be determined at intake
Provisional DiagnosisSeparation anxiety disorder (F93.0)

Presenting Problem

You are a licensed mental health counselor working in a community counseling agency. Marcus, a 38-year-old father, brings his 8-year-old son, Theo, to intake at the suggestion of Theo's pediatrician, who found no medical cause for his morning stomachaches. Theo's mother, a Navy officer, deployed overseas five months ago and is expected home in about seven months.

Marcus reports that about two months after she left, Theo began crying and clinging to him at school drop-off almost every morning. Over the past ten weeks Theo has missed nine school days because of stomachaches that "disappear by ten o'clock if he's home." Theo will not fall asleep unless Marcus lies down in his room, and he has stopped going to sleepovers and to his Saturday swim lessons unless Marcus stays on the pool deck. "He follows me from room to room. If I go out to the mailbox, he's at the window," Marcus says. When Marcus is late for pickup, Theo asks the office to call him again and again. Theo tells you, "What if something happens to Daddy while I'm at school? Then nobody would be home." He has nightmares "about once a week" about getting lost in a store.

His teacher reports that he is quiet during class discussions but plays easily with two close friends at recess. His reading grades have slipped because of missed days. Marcus notes that Theo also throws tantrums when asked to turn off video games, "but that's been going on since he was six." Theo denies wanting to hurt himself or anyone else, and Marcus reports no self-harm or aggression. Theo's mother calls by video about once a week, and Theo is "clingy and weepy for the rest of the night" after each call.

Mental Status Exam

Theo is dressed in a clean school uniform and appropriately groomed for his age. He is oriented to person, place, and time and knows he is visiting "the feelings doctor." He sits pressed against his father for the first ten minutes, then moves to the play table while Marcus stays in the room. His affect is anxious and brightens during play; he describes his mood as "scared sometimes." Eye contact is shy at first and improves. Speech, motor activity, and gait are age appropriate, and memory for recent events appears intact. Thought process is logical for his age; thought content centers on his parents' safety. He denies hearing or seeing things others do not and denies wishes to hurt himself or others. No elevated mood or substance exposure is reported.

Psychosocial and Family History

Theo is the only child of Marcus, a self-employed landscaper, and his mother, who also deployed once when Theo was 3. The family moved to the area 18 months ago and has no relatives nearby. Marcus describes the household as close and says money is "fine, just stretched" since he cut back his work hours to handle school pickups. The family attends a nondenominational church, where Theo enjoys the children's program. A trauma screen is negative. Marcus says that in a military family "you just suck it up," and he doesn't want Theo "thinking it's okay to fall apart." He signs the consent for treatment and, at the end of intake, asks that you tell him "everything Theo says" in individual sessions so he can pass it along to Theo's mother on their calls.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: C

"Let's have the ship come home even faster next time.": Directive: child-centered play therapy lets the child lead the play.

"Is this ship like your mom's ship coming home to you?": Interpretive question: it imposes an adult meaning instead of staying in the child's metaphor.

"The ship made it home, and they were all waiting.": Correct. Tracking and reflecting within the play metaphor follows the child's lead and conveys understanding of his feeling of relief.

"Great job! That's a really good ship you built today.": Evaluative praise moves the child toward pleasing the counselor; child-centered work uses encouragement and reflection.

In child-centered play therapy, the counselor tracks and reflects within the child's play metaphor rather than directing, interpreting or praising.

Question 12

Which stage of group development do the events of this meeting most reflect?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: B

initial stage: By the third meeting the challenge to the leader, monopolizing and nervous silences have gone past the cautious orientation of the initial stage.

transition stage: Correct. A member challenging the leader ("when do we actually learn the tools?"), a monopolizer, nervous laughter and a quiet member testing safety are hallmarks of the transition stage.

working stage: The working stage shows high trust and members working directly with one another, not resistance and testing.

final stage: The final stage centers on consolidating learning and ending; five meetings remain.

The transition stage features anxiety, resistance, conflict, struggles for control and challenges to the leader, which the leader treats as normal and works through openly.

Question 13

How would you address the rifle as you continue building the client's safety plan?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: A

Arrange with him for his brother to store the rifle for now.: Correct. Lethal-means counseling aims to put time and distance between a person and the method he has already pictured; his brother is willing and nearby, so temporary off-site storage is the strongest option.

Have him agree to keep the rifle unloaded in the locked garage cabinet.: Helpful but second best: he holds the key, so the method he rehearsed stays within easy reach.

Ask him to sign an agreement not to harm himself before next session.: No-suicide contracts are not an effective safety intervention and do not reduce access to means.

Emphasize calling 988 if he feels drawn to the rifle again.: The crisis line is already in the plan; it does not address access to the firearm.

For a client who has pictured a firearm method, temporary off-site storage with a trusted person is the core lethal-means step of a collaborative safety plan.

Question 14

Which structural intervention would you use next to strengthen the parental subsystem?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: B

Coach Daniel to enforce consequences so Owen accepts his authority.: Tempting but wrong for a new stepfamily: having the stepparent lead discipline before a bond exists escalates "you're not my dad" conflict and leaves Megan's overruling unchanged.

Have Megan and Daniel agree on house rules together in session.: Correct: an in-session task in which the couple negotiates rules marks a boundary around the adults and interrupts the coalition, with Megan then enforcing them.

Explore how each adult's family of origin handled discipline.: Off-theory: family-of-origin exploration is Bowenian; it does not restructure the current hierarchy.

Have Owen propose the rules he considers fair in each household.: Inverts the hierarchy by giving the child rule-making power the structural goal is to restore to the adults.

Structural interventions restore hierarchy by strengthening the parental subsystem; in stepfamilies the biological parent usually leads discipline while the stepparent builds the relationship.

Test yourself under exam conditions

Take the free NCMHCE test and get a score report by domain.

The full NCMHCE question bank is coming. Get an email when it launches.