Based on the texts, how would the author of Text 2 most likely respond to the conclusion of "some researchers" in Text 1?
Text 1
Lake sediment records show that the Maya lowlands experienced a series of severe droughts between about 800 and 1000 CE, the same period in which many large Maya cities were abandoned. Some researchers conclude that drought alone explains the collapse: without reliable rain, farmers could not feed dense urban populations.
Text 2
Drought surely strained Maya society, but it struck a region already under stress. Inscriptions from the period record growing warfare between rival cities, and some kingdoms had lost the political authority that once organized labor and trade. Several cities declined before the worst droughts began.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
By denying that the Maya lowlands experienced severe drought: Text 2 accepts the drought ("Drought surely strained Maya society"); it disputes only that drought was the sole cause.
By agreeing that drought was the only significant cause of the collapse: Text 2 adds warfare and lost "political authority" as further pressures, so it does not see drought as the only cause.
By claiming that warfare between cities caused the droughts: Text 2 treats warfare and drought as separate stresses; it never suggests that fighting caused the lack of rain.
By arguing that drought contributed to the collapse but cannot fully explain it: Correct. Text 2 grants that drought "strained Maya society" but points to warfare, weakened authority, and cities that "declined before the worst droughts began," challenging the claim that "drought alone explains the collapse."
When Text 1 offers a single cause, check whether Text 2 accepts that cause, rejects it, or keeps it while adding others.