AP U.S. History Practice Test 8

Schenck v. United States, 1919

"We admit that in many places and in ordinary times the defendants in saying all that was said in the circular [urging resistance to the draft] would have been within their constitutional rights. But the character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it is done. . . . The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic. . . . The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight and that no Court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right."

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., opinion of the Court, Schenck v. United States, 1919