In a study of a new medication for low mood, participants receive either the medication or an identical-looking placebo pill and do not know which they received. The research assistants who interview participants and rate their mood, however, know each participant's group. Which change would best protect the study from bias in the mood ratings?
Show answer & explanation
Answer: E
Use a single-blind procedure: The study is already single-blind (participants are unaware); the remaining bias comes from the raters, who would still know the groups.
Replace the placebo with no pill at all: Removing the placebo would add participant expectancy effects and would not hide group membership from the raters.
Increase the number of participants: A larger sample reduces random error but does not remove a systematic bias in how ratings are made.
Switch to a correlational design: A correlational design would lose the ability to test cause and effect and would not address rater bias.
Use a double-blind procedure: Correct. In a double-blind procedure neither the participants nor the people collecting the data know who received the medication, so the assistants' expectations cannot shape their ratings.
Single-blind hides the condition from participants; double-blind also hides it from the experimenters who collect the data.